Terry, here's a reply from
anyone.
terry wrote:But what if we try a nine in r3c2. WE can still come out with a No for r1c6 being No 7 in this case I think...
I think not! Did you miss this?
simes wrote: r3c2=2, r1c3=9, r8c3=8, r8c4=3, r8c6=9, c7c6=7, r1c6=3
or
r3c2=9, r5c2=3, r5c8=7, c3c8=3, r1c7=7, r1c6=3
It's funny that you managed to follow all the steps except for the last line I thought the last line was pretty straightforward once youd eliminated candidates via all those steps.
terry wrote:teh chains you talk about are only a guessing game
It's trial & error but it's not guessing - if two chains from the same cell lead to the same answer in another cell by different loops then you have a
proof, not a
guess. It's only guessing if you don't check both loops. simes' chains led to a
proof for r1c6. My chains were a lot longer but didn't require the colouring step - they led to a
proof for r6c1.
With a valid puzzle you never need to take a punt as you put it and you will never be in the position of finding out later in the puzzle that you made a wrong move. Every number you enter is the one and only number for that cell, otherwise you dont enter it.