Draco wrote:aran wrote:- Code: Select all
3 459 1459 | 7 1248 258 | 129 6 124
2 6 1459 | 13 14 35 | 1379 8 1347
147 47 8 | 1236 9 236 | 123 5 1234
---------------+----------------+--------------
6 2 14 | 9 38 7 | 5 134 138
489 489 7 | 5 238 1 | 6 34 238
158 58 3 | 4 268 268 | 128 7 9
---------------+----------------+--------------
789 1 269 | 2368 5 2369 | 4 39 378
4789 3 469 | 168 167 69 | 178 2 5
5789 5789 259 | 1238 127 4 | 1378 139 6
1.4r8c1=4r8c3-(4=1)r4c3-(14=59)r12c3-(59=4)r1c2 : =>
<4>r3c12.134r2c459=7r2c9-7r7c9=7r7c1-(7=1)r3c1 : =>
<1>r2c33.134r2c459=7r2c9-7r7c9=7r7c1-(7=1)r3c1-(1=58r6c12)-(8=26)r6c56-(28=1)r6c7-(1=34)r45c8-(3=9)r7c8-9r7c7=236r367c6 : =>
<3>=5r2c6 =><5>r2c34.459b1=1r1c3-(1=4)r4c3-(4=89)r5c12-(8=5)r6c2-(5=49)(r1c2+r2c3) : =>
<4>=7r3c2multiple singles reducing to a simple finale
I thought I posted tis; apparently I didn't.
Draco : not sure what you mean. I didn't see any posting by you other than the initial post with this :
Draco wrote:Here's a puzzle that I generated. SE rates it at 7.3, but needs a Turbot + 12 chains to crack it). Looks like there are a lot of potential paths thru this one after SSTS. I found one way using a contradiction chain, some singles and a forcing chain that cracks it to singles
Draco wrote:Aran you lost me on the first chain; I must be misreading the notation. I think your conclusion for #1 is r3c1<>4, is that right? If not, the what? if so, then why isn't it r3c12<>4??
Endpoints of the first chain are 4r8c1 and 4r1c2, so they eliminate what they both see : 4r3c1 (but not 4r3c2 which is not seen by both).
Just to present in words that first chain :
4r8c1=4r8c3-(4=1)r4c3-(14=59)r12c3-(59=4)r1c2r8c1 not 4=>r8c3 is 4=>r4c3 not 4, is 1=>neither 1 nor 4 in r12c3=>hence r12c3 is pair 59=>59 removed from r1c2 which becomes 4.