feste wrote:I have trouble recognizing hidden singles
Well, look at this puzzle for an example:
- Code: Select all
-1- 78- --9
6-4 912 -85
7-- --6 1--
4-7 -3- 926
--- 6-5 ---
826 -7- 5-3
--5 1-- --8
34- 258 6-7
9-- -64 -5-
Look at the cell in row 4, column 2 (r4c2). Here is what could go there:
1 - No: already at r1c2
2 - No: already in Box 4 (4-7, ---, 826)
3 - No: already at r4c5
4 - No: already in Box 4 (4-7, ---, 826)
5
6 - No: already in Box 4 (4-7, ---, 826)
7 - No: already in Box 4 (4-7, ---, 826)
8 - No: already in Box 4 (4-7, ---, 826)
9 - No: already at r4c7
Only 5 remains. It is "naked" as opposed to "hidden" by convention.
Now look the cell at r3c4. Here is what could go there:
1 - No: already in Box 2 (78-,912,--6)
2 - No: already in Box 2 (78-,912,--6)
3
4
5
6 - No: already in Box 2 (78-,912,--6)
7 - No: already in Box 2 (78-,912,--6)
8 - No: already in Box 2 (78-,912,--6)
9 - No: already in Box 2 (78-,912,--6)
Well, rats! No "naked" single. But we look at the other two cells that are empty in box 2 and see that 5 cannot go there. So it must go in r3c4. It was "hidden" because 3 and 4 could also go there. The 5 goes there because it can't go anywhere else.
Mac