eleven wrote:Steerpike58, if you look at the givens/solved cells instead of the candidates, you will spot the hidden singles, pairs etc much easier than the naked sets - and you don't need to fill the candidates in.
In your puzzle
- Code: Select all
+-------+-------+-------+
| x x x | 7 2*4*| . . . |
| 1 . x | . 9 . | . . . |
| 9 . 6 | . 3 . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 5 8 . | . . . | . 6 . |
| . . . | . . 7 | . 3 . |
| . . . | 8 . . | 9 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 2*| 3 . . | . . 7 |
| . 9 . | . . . | 4 . 2 |
| . . 4*| . . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
you have 24 given both in row 1 and column 3. So both cannot be in r1c123 and r2c3. So they must go to r23c2 in box 1 (hidden pair). This leaves only r2c3 for 7, and the rest are singles.
More good insight! So in box 1, you can eliminate 2, 5, 7 from B2, and 5, 7 from C2 using the hidden pair 24 (which leads to the hidden single 7 in B3). I don't understand your comment 'and the rest are singles' (but I'm still a newbie!).
I've tried several times to do a 'quick pass' looking for obvious singles, based on 'givens'/'solved cells', but I find myself often spinning my wheels relative to just 'biting the bullet' and 'getting on with it', working out the candidates methodically for each cell. A compromise I'm leaning towards at the moment is to start working out the candidates for the 'most populated box', on the assumption that that box will have the highest likelihood of quick singles being revealed. Another strategy I've tried is looking at which number is most prevalent on the board at the start, and assume that that number is going to be the easiest one to find singles for - but that's probably not valid.
At the moment, being a complete newbie (but now armed and moderately capable with all the 'basic' strategies up to X-wings and Y-wings - struggling to grasp 'basic coloring' at the moment), I feel a bit overwhelmed by the number of possible strategies, and find it quite tedious to go through looking for last candidates over and over, after each 'discovery' (by row, by column, by box). But - I just need to keep practicing! I'm starting to see naked triples leaping out at me now, while a few days ago they were a struggle. So I need to keep plodding on! I also want to avoid easy puzzles that don't require anything but hidden singles, but also avoid puzzles that get into the real nitty gritty stuff (extreme and diabolical strategies). If I'm on my laptop, I just stick to 'Sudoku Solver' (sudokuwiki.org) but sadly, I downloaded his android app and it's totally unusable so I find myself trying random other android apps, and then I discover that every app seems to have its own definition of difficulty. I tried an 'Expert' puzzle at sudoku.com (which has a beautiful, easy-to-read layout) and solved it entirely with naked pairs. So for my phone, I need an app that has easy-to-read graphics, and also a rational difficulty rating!
Anyway - thanks for the insight!