Glenn100 wrote:This Sudoku does have a 3 in r3c2!  When I ran this through on Scanraid there is a  3r3c2 showing but when I emailed this to Super Sudoku, the 3 was not showing since this was the deleted number. Just the way Scanraid does things. Yes, you are correct there certainly should have been a 3 in r3c2. Does this make any difference in your reply? I do appreciate your reply. An interesting aspect about this puzzle was that even though it was rated 1227, I ran it through Scanraid solely with only  Digital Forcing Chains selected along with the basic stuff which must run. The Digital Forcing Chains is really a powerful algorithm.
No.
Forcing Chains are very powerful. However, many people don't use/support them. Instead, the preference is to use an AIC.
- Code: Select all
-  after basics and an X-Wing
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |  2       4       36      |  7       359     1       |  369     8       3569    |
 |  5       1379    378     |  389     6       4       |  1239    1239    239     |
 |  39      1369    368     |  3589    389     2       |  4       13569   7       |
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 |  34789   3789    2       |  389     134789  6       |  5       1349    349     |
 |  6       3579    347     |  359     13479   3579    |  1239    12349   8       |
 |  3489    3589    1       |  2       3489    359     |  7       3469    3469    |
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 |  1       378     9       |  6       37      357     |  238     2345    234     |
 |  378     3678    5       |  4       2       379     |  3689    369     1       |
 |  34      2       346     |  1       359     8       |  369     7       3569    |
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 # 129 eliminations remain
 
 AIC w/2x ALS: (1=369)r1c3,r3c12 - (6=389)r3c135  =>  r3c2<>39
 
The AIC can be viewed as a forcing chain where one stream is obvious and doesn't need to be explicitly listed.
Forcing chain perspective:
- Code: Select all
-  r3c2= 1                                       =>  r3c2<>39   (obvious stream)
 
 r3c2<>1  r1c3,r3c12=369  r3c3<>6  r3c135=389  =>  r3c2<>39
 
In order to keep everyone from jumping on me all at once, I will specify that the AIC definition does not use a forcing chain perspective.