Five diamonds

Post puzzles for others to solve here.

Five diamonds

Postby m_b_metcalf » Sun May 10, 2026 10:29 am

I looked for a diamond rating for Haijime's nice four-diamond pattern, and finally mined this elusive gem:

Code: Select all
 . . 1 . . . 2 . .
 . 3 . 4 . 1 . 5 .
 5 . . . 6 . . . 3
 . 7 . 8 . 3 . 9 .
 . . 9 . 5 . 3 . .
 . 1 . 9 . 6 . 2 .
 9 . . . 8 . . . 1
 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 .
 . . 4 . . . 6 . .

..1...2...3.4.1.5.5...6...3.7.8.3.9...9.5.3...1.9.6.2.9...8...1.5.6.7.8...4...6..


But it's very hard (like a real diamond)!

Mike
User avatar
m_b_metcalf
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 13738
Joined: 15 May 2006
Location: Berlin

Re: Five diamonds

Postby Hajime » Sun May 10, 2026 3:22 pm

m_b_metcalf wrote:I looked for a diamond rating for Haijime's nice four-diamond pattern, and finally mined this elusive gem:
Code: Select all
..1...2...3.4.1.5.5...6...3.7.8.3.9...9.5.3...1.9.6.2.9...8...1.5.6.7.8...4...6..
But it's very hard (like a real diamond)!

Nice job, SE=9.0/9.0/9.0 and minimal of course, but the r5c5 cell is filled, which is extra wrt the original diamond-pattern.
I could not find a diamond without r5c5.
I will post my highest pearl in another topic.
User avatar
Hajime
 
Posts: 1449
Joined: 20 April 2018
Location: Fryslân

Re: Five diamonds

Postby m_b_metcalf » Sun May 10, 2026 4:39 pm

Hajime wrote: but the r5c5 cell is filled, which is extra wrt the original diamond-pattern.


Yes, you're right, and I have no idea how the extra clue crept in :?:
User avatar
m_b_metcalf
2017 Supporter
 
Posts: 13738
Joined: 15 May 2006
Location: Berlin


Return to Puzzles