Elegance

Everything about Sudoku that doesn't fit in one of the other sections

Elegance

Postby Luke » Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 am

How would you define "elegant?"

It's a popular term hereabouts. Judging by context, it would seem to mean "pure and simple," or "short and sweet."

(I remember the last time I personally used the term: "Both of the super-models I dated last night agreed my tux was elegant.")
User avatar
Luke
2015 Supporter
 
Posts: 435
Joined: 06 August 2006
Location: Southern Northern California

Postby storm_norm » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:33 am

Image
the fastest bird of prey in the world, reaching max speeds around 322 kph, the Peregrine Falcon's prey (other birds) pray never to see one.
storm_norm
 
Posts: 85
Joined: 27 February 2008

Postby udosuk » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:47 pm

My definition of elegance is:

Using the minimal amount of information and the simplest possible logic, create the maximal amount of deductions.

In other words, moves that use fewer cells (small ALSs vs long chains), less assumptions (e.g. no uniqueness), less implications (e.g. simple chains vs nets, "memory"), more eliminations (e.g. wings, fishes) are considered by me as more elegant than others.:idea:
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005

Postby storm_norm » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:10 am

rolls royce phantom II also comes to mind
storm_norm
 
Posts: 85
Joined: 27 February 2008

Postby Luke » Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:24 am

Very nice definition, udosuk. Elegant, even.

"Scientific elegance" from Webster's:
Code: Select all
 scientific precision, neatness, and simplicity <the elegance of a mathematical proof>
User avatar
Luke
2015 Supporter
 
Posts: 435
Joined: 06 August 2006
Location: Southern Northern California

Postby udosuk » Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:58 pm

Thanks for the appreciation, Luke.:)

The Webster's definition works fine too for Sudoku moves.
udosuk
 
Posts: 2698
Joined: 17 July 2005


Return to General