Leren wrote:I cheated and used Hodoku, which gives an OTP solution with Just one Swordfish. Leren
Difficult to beat you on that.
I use Hodoku occasionally and I like is clean interface. I also like its clear definition of the rules used (though its formulation of some Uniqueness rules could be improved) and the accompanying examples. Being written in Java, it's highly portable. Like Sudoku Explainer, I have no problem running it on my Mac, even with the recent versions of MacOS that no longer support 32-bit code.
However, I can't say I'm very familiar with Hodoku (or SE). SudoRules finds a Naked-Pair and a Hidden-Pair before a Swordfish:
- Code: Select all
***********************************************************************************************
*** SudoRules 20.1.s based on CSP-Rules 2.1.s, config = S
*** Using CLIPS 6.32-r773
***********************************************************************************************
hidden-single-in-a-column ==> r3c6 = 1
164 candidates, 778 csp-links and 778 links. Density = 5.82%
whip[1]: c2n4{r8 .} ==> r7c1 ≠ 4
naked-pairs-in-a-row: r8{c3 c8}{n2 n8} ==> r8c7 ≠ 8, r8c2 ≠ 2
naked-single ==> r8c2 = 4
hidden-pairs-in-a-row: r2{n1 n2}{c2 c3} ==> r2c3 ≠ 7
whip[1]: r2n7{c8 .} ==> r1c7 ≠ 7, r3c8 ≠ 7
swordfish-in-columns: n3{c2 c5 c8}{r3 r5 r7} ==> r7c9 ≠ 3, r7c6 ≠ 3, r5c7 ≠ 3, r5c3 ≠ 3, r3c9 ≠ 3
stte
Is this due to some Hodoku default priority settings (e.g. Swordfish > Pairs) or did you choose some specific settings?