diagonal boxes

Everything about Sudoku that doesn't fit in one of the other sections

diagonal boxes

Postby Laura58 » Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:31 pm

Hi, I'm new to the forum. Don't know if this question has come up before. But I've been wondering if it would be possible to have a Sudoku puzzel where the boxes that cross diagonally in the center also do not repeat the numbers.

Would that make for a tougher or easier puzzel?
Laura58
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 28 December 2005

Postby Animator » Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:34 pm

Yes it is possible. And yes it has been asked before.

Easier/Tougher hard to tell... My best guess is that it's could be a little easier...
Animator
 
Posts: 469
Joined: 08 April 2005

Postby Red Ed » Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:35 pm

Here's the old thread on that topic: http://forum.enjoysudoku.com/viewtopic.php?p=3366

Oh, and another: http://forum.enjoysudoku.com/viewtopic.php?p=7037

Commercially, this variant is known as Sudoku X.
Red Ed
 
Posts: 633
Joined: 06 June 2005

Postby Nick67 » Wed Dec 28, 2005 10:14 pm

Hi Laura,

Here is an example puzzle:

Code: Select all
 *-----------*
 |.4.|.6.|.9.|
 |6.8|1..|3.5|
 |.9.|5.8|..4|
 |---+---+---|
 |2.7|...|9.3|
 |...|7.3|...|
 |3.1|...|4.7|
 |---+---+---|
 |8..|6.5|.4.|
 |5.2|..4|1.6|
 |.7.|.1.|.3.|
 *-----------*


Just to be clear: the usual Sudoku rule applies, AND each
number 1-9 must appear once in both of the diagonals.

I made this puzzle using Simple Sudoku, based on
this post by george-no1. The solution appears there.
(The post is in one of the threads that Red Ed mentioned.)
Nick67
 
Posts: 113
Joined: 24 August 2007

Postby Lardarse » Thu Dec 29, 2005 7:04 pm

Animator wrote:Easier/Tougher hard to tell... My best guess is that it's could be a little easier...

The easy ones will be easier, because there's more chances to have just singles. The harder puzzles will be much harder, though, because there could very likely be pairs or even triples on the diagonals, and they won't be easy to spot.

One other thing is that you can't use the uniqueness rule if one of the cells is on a diagonal...
Lardarse
 
Posts: 106
Joined: 01 July 2005

Postby tso » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:35 pm

Nick67 wrote:Hi Laura,

Here is an example puzzle:

Code: Select all
 *-----------*
 |.4.|.6.|.9.|
 |6.8|1..|3.5|
 |.9.|5.8|..4|
 |---+---+---|
 |2.7|...|9.3|
 |...|7.3|...|
 |3.1|...|4.7|
 |---+---+---|
 |8..|6.5|.4.|
 |5.2|..4|1.6|
 |.7.|.1.|.3.|
 *-----------*


Just to be clear: the usual Sudoku rule applies, AND each
number 1-9 must appear once in both of the diagonals.

I made this puzzle using Simple Sudoku, based on
this post by george-no1. The solution appears there.
(The post is in one of the threads that Red Ed mentioned.)


Although both diagonals contain the digits 1-9, this puzzle can be solved without that extra information. Compare a proper diagonal sudoku:

Code: Select all
 . . 5 | . . . | . 9 .
 . 6 2 | 1 . 7 | . . .
 8 . . | . . . | . . 7
-------+-------+------
 2 8 . | . . . | . . .
 . . . | . . . | . . .
 . . . | . . . | . 7 1
-------+-------+------
 1 . . | . . . | . . 9
 . . . | 4 . 9 | 3 8 .
 . 5 . | . . . | 7 . .


Easy to solve using the diagonals, multiple solutions without.
tso
 
Posts: 798
Joined: 22 June 2005

Postby Moschopulus » Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:31 am

I like the distinction. A genuine diagonal sudoku puzzle is one with multiple solutions when treated as an ordinary sudoku puzzle. It just happens that exactly one of these completions has 1-9 on both diagonals. Some ordinary sudoku puzzles have a solution (one solution of course) which happens to have 1-9 on both diagonals, so we could call them diagonal sudokus, but perhaps they should be considered fake and not allowed in this category.

Have you got a genuine diagonal sudoku puzzle with 17 clues?
Moschopulus
 
Posts: 256
Joined: 16 July 2005

Postby gfroyle » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:10 am

Moschopulus wrote:Have you got a genuine diagonal sudoku puzzle with 17 clues?


How about this..

Code: Select all
1.. 9.4 ...
2.. ... ...
... 6.. ..8

..5 .3. ...
... ... .29
.6. ... ...

... ... ...
... ..6 ...
.3. ... 5..


Not mine.. it was sent to me by someone who thought it might be of interest with respect to the 16-clue search...

Gordon
gfroyle
 
Posts: 214
Joined: 21 June 2005


Return to General