champagne wrote:
As usual, you have several ways to reach the same conclusion.
The solver gives priority to the shortest clearing AICs.
Ronk wrote
- Code: Select all
I'm not trying to find a shorter way, a longer way, or even another way. I'm trying to figure out the way your solver used.
The typos didn't help. The fact that you abbreviate a portion of the chain with rMcN.E = rScT.e doesn't help.
The fact that the right end of your chain doesn't loop back to r5c5 doesn't help.
A solver finding a solution path to a difficult puzzle is great, but note that this site is called the Players' Forum.
If the presentation for a solver step doesn't quickly communicate the inference stream to a player,
Ok Ronk, you are surely right. I am doing my best to clarify my posts, but there is some work.
I have nevertheles a limit. If somebody has not enough motivation to read the full tagging principles, there will be some opacity in my posts.
I try here after to comment a little more that AIC
First of all, my AICs are following the general rule agreed here for AICs (thanks to Mike Barker who helped me).
The main specificity of AICs in full tagging is that your never find several strong links attached. You jump from one point to another one.
This comes normally on layers shown on the map. In any case, adding the tag to the candidate or the group of candidates gives an easy way to rebuild the jump.
This happens also at the ends. []8r5c5.F - .. - 8r4c3.F means clearly that tag 'F' is not valid. 8r5c5 and 8r4c3 will be cleared.
For user more familair with full tagging, I would have written :
- Code: Select all
[] Fp PM mC cE eF 'F' is dead. (which is exactly the same).
Here is the map revised to keep only used layers.
- Code: Select all
28 2789 5 |179 179 3 |12r7 6 4
2346 234679 2369 |14579 14679 145B7 |1237 1238c 1m38C
1 3467 36 |8 467 2 |35e7 3e5E 9
------------------------------------------------------------------
23456 1 2368F9e |345 248 458 |2349E 7 36
7 234 238f |6 1p248F 9 |1234 123 5
23456 234569 2369 |13457 1247 1457 |8 1239e 1M36
------------------------------------------------------------------
9 3C68 4 |2 5 6H8 |13 138C 7
235 2358 1 |479 4789 478 |6 5e9E 3C8c
568 568 7 |1e9E 3 1E6h8 |5E9e 4 2
The AIC was
- Code: Select all
[]8r5c5.F - 1r5c5.p = 1r5c78.P - 1r6c9.M = 1r2c9.m - 8r2c9.C = 8r8c9.c - 8r8c56.E = 9r4c3.e - 8r4c3.F
If I clean the tag where there is no jump and nothing special, I can write it
- Code: Select all
[]8r5c5.F - 1r5c5 = 1r5c78 - 1r6c9 = 1r2c9 - 8r2c9 = 8r8c9 - 8r8c56.E = 9r4c3.e - 8r4c3.F
I gave a specific comment to justify the strong link 8r8c56.E = 9r4c3.e.
Another way would have been, I agree, to replace the comment by
8r8c9 - AC:r8c456r9c4(8r8c56 = 9r4c3) - 8r4c3And I could have written two AICs including the 'F' layer
- Code: Select all
[]8r5c5 - 1r5c5 = 1r5c78 - 1r6c9 = 1r2c9 - 8r2c9 = 8r8c9 - AC:r8c456r9c4(8r8c56 = 9r4c3) - 8r4c3 = 8r4c5 - 8r5c5
[]8r4c3 - 8r4c5 = 8r5c5 - 1r5c5 = 1r5c78 - 1r6c9 = 1r2c9 - 8r2c9 = 8r8c9 - AC:r8c456r9c4(8r8c56 = 9r4c3) - 8r4c3
your comment will surely help to improve the communication.
Unfortunately, for toughest puzzles, other difficulties appear, but I am prepared to work with you on improvment of the form.