eleven wrote: (1=39782)r6c46289 - (8|2=34691)b3p23569 => -1r2c4, stte
Turns out to be complementary to Space's.
But much prettier! I guess that's an AALS-XZ (added: or perhaps not exactly, see below). And here I thought I'd found a relatively simple way to write it, considering I first saw it as this:
- Code: Select all
DP(69)r789c7
||
(1)r89c7 - r3c7 = (1)r2c8
||
(3)r79c7 - (3=2)r5c7 - r5c3 = (2-1)r6c3 = (1)r6c4
||
(7)r789c7 - r4c7 = (7-2)r6c9 = (2-1)r6c3 = (1)r6c4
=> -1 r2c4; stte
--
Added. I think your chain might actually need a comma:
(1=397,82)r6c46289 - (8|2=34691)b3p23569 => -1r2c4
It's not obvious until you read it backwards without it:
(19643=2|8)b3p23569 - (28=7931)r6c98264
That doesn't work because the 8s in AALS b (8r12c8) don't see all instances of the 8s in ALS a, specifically 8r6c2. For the same reason I don't think it's a pure AALS-XZ after all, because all RCD instances don't see each other. The effect is the same anyhow.
A good thing is that the comma actually makes it clearer anyway because it separates the linking digits.