Hi, Cenoman, thanks for your almost short solution. It is instructive to see how you manage to replace krakens by these ‘almost patterns’. Actually, none of the first three eliminations can be done by a single chain. I solved this puzzle some months ago by simpler methods, but I could not come to a solution of reasonable length.
In my approach, this puzzle is of ALSC-class, that is, its solution needs at least one AIC with ALS’s in addition to AICs with or without groups, but no forcing chains are needed. According to its ER 7.8, its solution should require
Nishio Forcing Chains, which is less informative to a manual solver.
Another side of the puzzle’s complexity is how long the solution is, and this is harder to formalize. HoDoKu’s rating is based on the sum of the weights of the methods used in its default solution, and it will be great even if the methods used are rather simple but the solution is long. On the other hand, programs rarely provide good solutions, and in most cases the number of steps can be greatly lessened after optimization made by hand. So for now I think it is useful to add an inexplicit parameter ‘long’ to the formal rating based on the methods used if the solution is long enough.
Now let us consider concrete puzzles. The current puzzle surely requires a long solution, so I rate is as ALSC (long) (ER 7.8 in standard terms).
One of my previous puzzles also requires a long solution, but as it is solvable by standard patterns and basic AICs, I rate is as C (long) (ER 6.9 in standard terms).
The third puzzle is solvable in two moves by AICs with groups, so I rate it as GC (ER 8.3 in standard terms).