Hi Madolite.
Madolite wrote:Do I need to look for AIC chains in these kinds of mid-game puzzles? Is that the only solution?
No and yes. These kinds of puzzles can be solved with pretty simple named patterns. However, most of them are actually short AICs, so understanding the underlying principles of AICs makes finding and using those simpler patterns easier as well. In fact, you don't have to know their names or specific shapes and types if you can find any generic chains. That's how I learned to solve non-basic puzzles. I learned specific patterns and their names later, not because it was necessary for solving but because it made communication with others easier (and it also helps to spot those special cases faster).
NB: If there's a wing pattern here, I'd love to hear about it cause I've just barely gotten into those.
Not sure what you mean by "wing pattern". As far as I'm concerned, X-Wings aren't really wings at all despite the name (it's a misnomer, because they're really fishes or single-digit loops). Things like W-Wings and XY-Wings are the most common and easiest to spot simple wings by the definition I've adopted (a simple multi-digit AIC with three strong links). More complex and rarely used simple wings are M-Wings, L-Wings, H-Wings, and S-Wings, but I wouldn't worry about them (I just see them as short AICs, and only look up the name if I really feel like it). Then there are XYZ-Wings and even (UV)WXYZ-Wings which are actually special cases of ALS-techniques, so I don't really see them in the same family as the simple wings.
I'm fairly certain there is no useful X-wing here
You're both wrong and right. There's an active X-Wing on 2s (r17\c39) which would eliminate 2r3c9. It's a pretty useless elimination, however, so from that point of view it's true that there's no useful X-Wing here.
(I only found c1r4-c8r6
You're right, that's a dud X-Wing. Btw, please say r4c1 instead of c1r4. That's easier to read for most of us here.
and some other potential wing at c6r7-c7r9). Is there something in c6r7-c7r9? That's my first thought.
There's no wing there, but you're right that there's something. It's a Unique Rectangle Type 1 -- probably the easiest non-basic pattern and one you should definitely learn first, imho, because it's very common and often effective. In this case it would allow you to eliminate 4 and 5 from r9c7, leaving there just 1. That would be quite useful, because you'd get several placements as a result, but it wouldn't solve the whole puzzle.
Other than that, most of what I just said
here applies to this puzzle as well. There are several patterns/techniques available that would reduce the puzzle to singles, including a couple of Skyscrapers (on 7s). Other single-digit possibilities are 2-String Kites and Empty Rectangles (both on 7s as well), and Simple Coloring would work too. Also a couple of W-Wings (27) and (67).
The easiest effective technique for me would be Skyscraper, but since I just showed an example of that for the linked puzzle, here's a W-Wing (27) solution for this one:
- Code: Select all
.------------------.------------.----------------.
| 5 4 a(2)7 | 3 8 b67 | 9 1 267 |
| 6 78 1 | 2 4 9 | 3 5 78 |
| 9 78-2 3 | 5 67 1 | 47 28 24678 |
:------------------+------------+----------------:
| 24 d(2)7 9 | 1 5 c67 | 8 46 3 |
| 3 6 5 | 4 2 8 | 17 9 17 |
| 48 1 78 | 9 67 3 | 2 46 5 |
:------------------+------------+----------------:
| 7 9 28 | 6 1 45 | 45 3 28 |
| 1 5 4 | 8 3 2 | 6 7 9 |
| 28 3 6 | 7 9 45 | 145 28 14 |
'------------------'------------'----------------'
W-Wing[27]: (2=7)r1c3 - (7)r1c6 = (7)r4c6 - (7=2)r4c2 => -2 r3c2; stte
And here's the other one (67) with two eliminations:
- Code: Select all
.--------------.----------------.----------------.
| 5 4 c27 | 3 8 d(6)7 | 9 1 267 |
| 6 78 1 | 2 4 9 | 3 5 78 |
| 9 278 3 | 5 7-6 1 | 47 28 24678 |
:--------------+----------------+----------------:
| 24 27 9 | 1 5 7-6 | 8 46 3 |
| 3 6 5 | 4 2 8 | 17 9 17 |
| 48 1 b78 | 9 a(6)7 3 | 2 46 5 |
:--------------+----------------+----------------:
| 7 9 28 | 6 1 45 | 45 3 28 |
| 1 5 4 | 8 3 2 | 6 7 9 |
| 28 3 6 | 7 9 45 | 145 28 14 |
'--------------'----------------'----------------'
W-Wing[67]: (6=7)r6c5 - (7)r6c3 = (7)r1c3 - (7=6)r1c6 => -6 r3c5,r4c6; stte
Imho, W-Wing is the easiest multi-digit pattern to spot, because its signature is two cells with the same two candidates, connected by a short symmetric chain. Some would say XY-Wing is the easiest because it has all bivalue cells, but it's non-symmetric with three different digits. You can learn about W-Wings (and XY-Wings)
here.
Btw, I see that you've found a solution on your own while I was typing this. Great! I'll review that shortly. Anything I said above should still be valid anyway.