pjb wrote:I'd be grateful if you could demonstrate how the symmetry is used to make eliminations
Thanks, Phil
here is the first puzzle after Phil moves plus the naked pair 47 in column 5
- Code: Select all
478 569 348 |2478 69 1 |2378 59 78
6789 2 5689 |678 3 789 |1578 4 15789
478 39 1 |5 47 2478 |2378 29 6
---------------------------------------------------------
3 4 7 |126 1569 259 |156 8 159
2 1569 569 |47 8 47 |156 1569 3
169 8 569 |136 1569 359 |4 7 2
---------------------------------------------------------
5 13 2348 |3478 47 6 |9 12 1478
14689 7 4689 |148 2 458 |1568 3 1458
48 16 2348 |9 15 3478 |278 156 478
At that point the easiest seems to use the symmetry constraint 9r1c5<->1r9c5
We can then either prove r1c6=6 or r9c5=5
1r9c5 =>9r1c5 - 9r1c8 =5r1c8 - 5r9c8 = 5r9c5 - 1r9c5 <> 1r9c5
after r1c5 = 6 and r9c5 = 5
r2c6=9 r7c4=1 r4c9=9 r6c1=1 ....
EDIT generally speaking, in my experience, once the limitations for the digits self mirror applied (in a central symmetry, this is only affecting r5c5, here given) the symmetry is best used in small contradiction chains skipping once or twice from a candidate to the mirror candidate.
Each contradiction chain as a mirror one, but the eliminations can also be duplicated using the symmetry.