American Scientist Article..

Everything about Sudoku that doesn't fit in one of the other sections

American Scientist Article..

Postby gfroyle » Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:17 pm

Ed Pegg's Mathpuzzle column contained a link to a Sudoku article in American Scientist.

http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/48550

A reasonable job on the Sudoku part, but got a bit lost when he tackled the computational complexity issues...

New Scientist will also have an article on Sudoku in their next (current?) issue...

Cheers

Gordon
gfroyle
 
Posts: 214
Joined: 21 June 2005

Postby PaulIQ164 » Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:03 pm

Yeah, there's an article in this week's New Scientist. Pretty good, all told. It actually names an inventor for the puzzle that sounds plausible, not Leonhard Euler or anyone.
PaulIQ164
 
Posts: 533
Joined: 16 July 2005

Re: American Scientist Article..

Postby Red Ed » Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:52 pm

gfroyle wrote:A reasonable job on the Sudoku part, but got a bit lost when he tackled the computational complexity issues...
Got a bit lost on the number of distinct grids, too, quoting Bertram and Frazer's 3,546,146,300,288 (number of reduced grids in a particular sense) rather than the much smaller 5,472,730,538 you get from applying the full range of available symmetries.
Red Ed
 
Posts: 633
Joined: 06 June 2005

Postby gfroyle » Sat Dec 24, 2005 4:08 am

PaulIQ164 wrote:Yeah, there's an article in this week's New Scientist. Pretty good, all told. It actually names an inventor for the puzzle that sounds plausible, not Leonhard Euler or anyone.


Just got the NS article.. they used a couple of 17s from my collection; I was concerned that they would be mistyped or something, but they seemed to get them right... they were slightly careless in labelling the diagram because they said "the minimum number of clues in a solvable sudoku IS 17" rather than "is ASSUMED to be 17".

I hasten to add that I DID tell Ivan Semeniuk (the author) that this was an unsolved problem...

The American Scientist article mentions that Garns is the "most likely" inventor of Sudoku, but that it is not known for sure. The reason is that the Dell puzzle mags in which they appeared first had a variety of puzzles, but they were not individually credited to specific authors. But by searching through the magazines, someone noticed that Garns was in the overall list of contributors if and only if the magazine contained a Sudoku....

Conclusion: he contributed Sudokus...

Cheers

Gordon
gfroyle
 
Posts: 214
Joined: 21 June 2005

Postby Pappocom » Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:57 am

gfroyle wrote:Conclusion: he contributed Sudokus...

I agree with your comments. Note that, anyway, the assumption can only be that he "contributed" Sudokus, not that he "invented" them. He might have been doing just what I did in 2004.

- Wayne
Pappocom
 
Posts: 599
Joined: 05 March 2005

Postby Lardarse » Sat Dec 24, 2005 4:22 pm

Pappocom wrote:I agree with your comments. Note that, anyway, the assumption can only be that he "contributed" Sudokus, not that he "invented" them. He might have been doing just what I did in 2004.

You mean introducing them to a new market (the UK) and having them respond with something along the lines of "More please!" ?
Lardarse
 
Posts: 106
Joined: 01 July 2005


Return to General

cron