Thank you both,
JC, my analysis should be more complete. Posted this 1 too early.
Leren, I can't believe I keep missing these skyscrapers. The logic behind it is very clear so it is quite frustrating that almost every puzzle I post is solved with a skyscraper, haha.
I was wondering if one of you has a tip for me regarding search strategies? One downside of the app I'm using is that it does not highlight candidates. That could be a first step, start using for instance
Sudoku Joy by Jason ... which does have this function.
But I was wondering, what is your strategy when you start doing a puzzle?
Now, I start looking for naked singles, bivalues and bilocals and then obeying Keith's principle (thanks to JC). When this doesn't result in anything anymore I start filling in all candidates and then look for patterns. Is this a right way to do it? I know i should develop my own style but i always am interested in how more advanced people work.
Furthermore I had some other questions:
I know this can differ completely per puzzle but what are your guidelines when you try to solve a puzzle? What are the most important strategies to look for?
I know a lot of the basic strategies now (UR, BUG, Remote pair, X-wing, Swordfish, Jellyfish (finned and sashimi for the most part), ER, 2-string kite, X-Wing, XY-wing and the list goes on... Since I'm very busy with my study I didn't have much time recently, but i have to start looking into the chaining strategy category. I think there is a lot of terrain to win in that domain.
When, of a certain digit, there is only a fish left (for instance swordfish 3), is there anything we can do with these candidates or is it necessary to solve other digitis and the solution of the fish comes by itself?
And as an elongation of the previous question: when I see an "almost" fish of a digit, lets say I find an almost jellyfish 6 (for example I have 3 rows which are organized good but then the none of the last 2 rows fits), does this implicate there is something that can be deduced from the candidates of this digit?
Thank you for your time in advance,
Daniël